This article is somewhat off-topic for this blog, but it does have some relationship to the general theme of seeking out that which is healthiest to consume.
Let me go on record here and say that I am NOT anti-vaccine; however, I strongly believe that vaccination policies need to be responsible, and I am not convinced that current policies are responsible.
The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 essentially removed any liability for vaccine products from the drug companies. Since then, I am not convinced that testing of vaccines has been adequate, leading to the entry of many questionable formulations into the market, some of which have been made mandatory for certain segments of the population. This has led to an increase in damaging side effects of vaccination, including death. Consider the following article: Lawsuit Proves HHS Hasn’t Filed Required Vaccine Safety Reports with Congress in 30 Years. It would seem that with no financial motivation to test, testing is no longer being done. This puts the public at risk.
The vaccine industry likes to play on our insecurities. Policy makers at the behest of vaccine lobbyists have sought to quell those insecurities by requiring more and more vaccines without adequate consideration for the risks and societal costs. For instance, who is to say that a life of disability or tortuous pain due to a vaccine side effect is better than a death from the disease it was intended to prevent? Are we as a society willing to take on the cost of maintaining a damaged person for the rest of their lives? What if there are many such damaged people?
One specific set of vaccine risks is due to their heavy metal content. The location where the molecules of these metals choose to lodge in the body can affect the functioning of that organ. If conductive metal particles lodge in the brain, short-circuiting of the neural network is certainly possible, potentially leading to difficulties of mental functioning. This article reports the proof of how this might be happening: Researchers show where the aluminum travels to in the body and stays after vaccination.
Autism is a very expensive disease, requiring the services of several types of experts such as doctors and special education teachers. The strain of raising an autistic child often leads to broken homes, creating additional financial and societal costs. Many autistic adults are not capable of providing for themselves, requiring continuing welfare from their parents and society for the rest of their lives. And autism is just one type of chronic disability that can result from vaccine injury.
Too many of these chronic cases can break a society. These days, just about every young parent I talk to has at least one child with some level of issues. What will happen when all of these children become adults? What percentage of them will need continuing care? Where do we draw the line? Should we not be doing more to prevent such costly and devastating outcomes? Isn’t that supposed to be the purpose of a vaccine in the first place?
It is also possible that the body can handle only so many vaccines. We may have to limit the number of vaccines in protocols and choose vaccines that prevent the most damaging diseases. Certainly, knowing what we know already, we should be limiting how many vaccines are given during any single office visit, possibly to as few as one.
All vaccines need to be able to pass a reasonable cost/benefit analysis that considers all risks and societal costs against the expected benefits. This is not an anti-vaccine stance. It’s a responsible vaccine stance.
Lest you doubt that there’s a problem, consider the following video compiled from the WHO Global Vaccine Safety Summit in December 2019.
The industry scientists KNOW that they have a problem. They need to stop vilifying those who challenge them on the safety issues, get back into the lab, and fix the problems. Continued vilification of challengers only deepens distrust of the industry. If the industry wants the populous to trust them, then they need to be honest with the public and do their due diligence. That’s true for anyone, really.
OK, I’m climbing off my soap box now.